org.simocracy.interview
Samples
19 randomly sampled records from the AT Protocol firehose
org.simocracy.interview (7 samples)
{
"sim": {
"cid": "",
"uri": "at://did:plc:nfd56jdcukm76ogr43ckjvr7/org.simocracy.sim/3mimre3rbkn24"
},
"$type": "org.simocracy.interview",
"createdAt": "2026-04-03T22:47:49.181Z",
"openAnswers": [
{
"answer": "All right, so you can hear me. Just test. Okay. Erase the last things. Okay. A high impact project. Can be of many different categories because there are some that really directly influence the lives of people and they should be judged on how many people do they reach and what is the difference they make in the lives of the people? Do they really serve the community? Do they not only have short term benefits, but actually think about what the impact is in the long term? And then there are also projects that build an",
"question": "What's your personal definition of a \"high-impact project\"?"
},
{
"answer": "And then the excellence of the roadmap or product that they have already built or planning to build.",
"question": "When you review a proposal, what are the top 3 things you look for?"
},
{
"answer": "And then the excellence of the roadmap or product that they have already built or planning to build. I think that is,",
"question": "What red flags make you skeptical about a proposal's credibility?"
},
{
"answer": "avoid, but otherwise I think it's fair to say that we need projects with measurable outcomes and we need projects with long-term systemic change.",
"question": "How do you balance measurable outcomes vs. long-term systemic change?"
},
{
"answer": "Yeah, that's what I would do. I would rank the teams and then make sure that the top teams have the resources to deliver and they could also like pivot. So the actual project is on an indicator of their own quality. Then I would always go for like who's the best team. Yeah,",
"question": "If you had limited resources, how would you decide which project to support?"
},
{
"answer": "and a perspective on we all hold just like a piece of the bigger puzzle foreign",
"question": "Which values guide your evaluations the most (e.g., equity, scale, innovation, sustainability)?"
},
{
"answer": "and a perspective on we all hold just like a piece of the bigger puzzle foreign The first is the 2016-17 season, which was the first season that the team was in the playoffs. An example of a project that I would enthusiastically fund, I mean, there are different ones, like some that are where I see that people are just putting their own work into something very concrete, like a regenerative land project, where you see the actual work and the care they take for the land that they steward, and you can just feel their connection. That is kind of on the one spectrum, something very concrete. And then the other one is the really ambitious, we want to change something where we use innovative technology to make, like to take a stab at a really big problem, which can be,",
"question": "Can you give an example of a project you'd enthusiastically fund, and why?"
},
{
"answer": "some of the attacks strengthen their current inequalities and just, yeah, basically try to do good, but don't really understand the systemic impact of what they do.",
"question": "Can you give an example of a project you'd likely reject, and why?"
},
{
"answer": "some of the attacks strengthen their current inequalities and just, yeah, basically try to do good, but don't really understand the systemic impact of what they do. The first two episodes of the series were released on DVD in 2009.",
"question": "What kind of message would you like to deliver? What signal do you want to give for the next round?"
},
{
"answer": "able to to execute on the ideas that they have and then are they is some motivation correct um so I think the motivation is actually more important than the idea um but it starts with execution because if you cannot execute it doesn't matter how your motivation and your idea doesn't matter if you have execution and the right motivation the ideas will come foreign",
"question": "How do you evaluate idea and execution? How do you separate them?"
},
{
"answer": "tries to interact with that and change it in meaningful ways.",
"question": "What kind of ideas do you value most?"
},
{
"answer": "If they can execute on bigger things, it is also the way they hold themselves and how they are not over promising and know what they can do and cannot do.",
"question": "How do you evaluate if a person or team is talented?"
},
{
"answer": "And the responsibilities that others gave them. Ideally, I would also look for, do I have signals from others about the people? And not only kind of from themselves.",
"question": "If you were an AI, how would you identify talent? What patterns would you look for?"
}
],
"yesNoAnswers": [
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects with strong community governance should receive preference in funding."
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Public goods that effectively demonstrate the benefit of public goods should receive more funding."
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Environmental sustainability should be a key factor in funding decisions."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Innovation and experimental approaches should be prioritized over proven solutions."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects with measurable outcomes should be favored over those with difficult-to-quantify benefits."
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funders should be accountable for the funding they provide to the selected projects."
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Humans are accountable for decisions made by an AI."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Public goods should prioritize immediate community needs over long-term systemic change."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects that already have a lot of support shouldn't receive additional donations for new small projects."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Cost effectiveness should be the primary criterion for funding allocation."
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funding decisions should consider geographic equity and underserved populations."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects that benefit the greatest number of people should be prioritized."
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funding should support projects with sustainable revenue models."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Open source software should be allocated the most funding compared to other categories."
}
]
}did:plc:nfd56jdcukm76ogr43ckjvr7 | at://did:plc:nfd56jdcukm76ogr43ckjvr7/org.simocracy.interview/3mimshobzt52j
org.simocracy.interviewTemplate (nested within org.simocracy.interview) (5 samples)
{
"sim": {
"cid": "bafyreiaejatteqeby5x4as7eldfpdlojjhxwhllo3pck2xb6baz6iawpbe",
"uri": "at://did:plc:4a4ekfv5ks66ogf52xh5u5mg/org.simocracy.sim/3mk572553q222"
},
"$type": "org.simocracy.interview",
"template": {
"cid": "bafyreibm4mpvr6bpawu5lavrv7knlgi64wtkd5wk36dt4hdlo77bd7u2lu",
"uri": "at://did:plc:4a4ekfv5ks66ogf52xh5u5mg/org.simocracy.interviewTemplate/3mk6xvrl6lc22"
},
"createdAt": "2026-04-23T22:28:41.700Z",
"openAnswers": [
{
"answer": "I value respect and trust and flourishing, and I would never compromise on flourishing.",
"question": "VALUES:\nIn a shared system where resources and decisions affect many people, what 3–5 values matter most to you, and which one would you refuse to compromise even under pressure?",
"questionId": "q-68ff71c6"
},
{
"answer": "Care and stability.",
"question": "VALUES (FORCED TRADEOFF)\nRank the following from most → least important:\nFairness / Efficiency / Belonging / Innovation / Stability / Care / Autonomy\nWhich would you sacrifice first, and which would you never sacrifice?",
"questionId": "q-83f7e9ce"
},
{
"answer": "Care and stability. If a law exists, it should serve the people.",
"question": "PRINCIPLES (VALUES → RULES)\nIf you had to define 3 rules that should always guide how this system operates, what would they be?\n(You can phrase them as: “If X → then Y”)",
"questionId": "q-f1ff83a5"
},
{
"answer": "We evaluate case by case. Um, for example, during a single week, um, people's needs might change if there's a conflict in how the space is used. Um, we had an immersive theater group come in, and they're utilizing the whole space, so people aren't able to use the shared space for two weeks. Um, but that trade-off creates the ability to have a really wonderful offering for the community and a magical one-time experience. But long term, that wouldn't work.",
"question": "TRADEOFF LOGIC \nWhen values conflict, how do you typically decide — do you follow consistent rules or evaluate case-by-case?\nGive one example.",
"questionId": "q-f79a535c"
},
{
"answer": "I'd say the Highland Park project might exclude some people, because I think that there are other people that can offer lower impact projects that include everyone.",
"question": "TRADEOFF SCENARIO \nWhich do you choose and why:\nA high-impact project that excludes some people vs a lower-impact project that includes everyone?",
"questionId": "q-d26123a6"
},
{
"answer": "I am most influenced by... Data and personal experience, and then probably consensus, experts, and then close relationships. Um, I'll change my mind if I'm presented with different data. Which-",
"question": "INFLUENCE MODEL\nRank what influences your decisions most:\nData / Personal experience / Experts / Consensus / Close relationships\nWhen do you change your mind?",
"questionId": "q-02bd414f"
},
{
"answer": "The red flags would be if a project is- Yeah. You can just come up- ... buying for- ... 14th floor. Um, there's almost no- ... personal promotion. And I think it's worthy when it's serving either a longer term systems change purpose or serving the community a lot.",
"question": "RESOURCE ALLOCATION LOGIC\nWhat makes a project or proposal “worthy” of funding or support? What are immediate red flags?",
"questionId": "q-214f35c3"
},
{
"answer": "Are you hungry, Judy? Yeah. It's okay.",
"question": "HUMAN ↔ AI CALIBRATION\nWhen would you trust AI over humans in decision-making, and if AI strongly disagrees with you, what do you do?",
"questionId": "q-afb12d9e"
},
{
"answer": "Are you hungry, Judy? Yeah. It's okay.",
"question": "TIME \nDo you optimize more for short-term results or long-term system health?",
"questionId": "q-cbb7e3d1"
},
{
"answer": "Being able to solve coordination tools for the tower that increase community cohesion. Um, that might look like things like community building events. It might look like us contributing to, um, resources that solve our governance issues.",
"question": "PRIORITIZATION \nGiven the Human Flourishing Floor is a shared space for community, experimentation, and governance, where do you believe it should prioritize its budget right now to most effectively support flourishing?",
"questionId": "q-270b8dce"
},
{
"answer": "We should spend the money on a combination of things that help our environment and things that help our community, um, because we haven't been able to build out the space since the beginning of the Frontier Tower.",
"question": "ALLOCATION \nIf the Floor had $2K to allocate this month, how would you distribute it across:\nCommunity (events, connection)\nInfrastructure (tools, coordination)\nIndividual support (grants, access)\nResearch & experimentation (Simocracy, governance)\nEnvironment (space, art, atmosphere)\nWhat drove your allocation, and what felt hardest to prioritize?",
"questionId": "q-398e3863"
}
],
"yesNoAnswers": []
}did:plc:4a4ekfv5ks66ogf52xh5u5mg | at://did:plc:4a4ekfv5ks66ogf52xh5u5mg/org.simocracy.interview/3mk72pvgots22
org.simocracy.sim (nested within org.simocracy.interview) (7 samples)
{
"sim": {
"cid": "",
"uri": "at://did:plc:nfd56jdcukm76ogr43ckjvr7/org.simocracy.sim/3mimre3rbkn24"
},
"$type": "org.simocracy.interview",
"createdAt": "2026-04-03T22:47:49.181Z",
"openAnswers": [
{
"answer": "All right, so you can hear me. Just test. Okay. Erase the last things. Okay. A high impact project. Can be of many different categories because there are some that really directly influence the lives of people and they should be judged on how many people do they reach and what is the difference they make in the lives of the people? Do they really serve the community? Do they not only have short term benefits, but actually think about what the impact is in the long term? And then there are also projects that build an",
"question": "What's your personal definition of a \"high-impact project\"?"
},
{
"answer": "And then the excellence of the roadmap or product that they have already built or planning to build.",
"question": "When you review a proposal, what are the top 3 things you look for?"
},
{
"answer": "And then the excellence of the roadmap or product that they have already built or planning to build. I think that is,",
"question": "What red flags make you skeptical about a proposal's credibility?"
},
{
"answer": "avoid, but otherwise I think it's fair to say that we need projects with measurable outcomes and we need projects with long-term systemic change.",
"question": "How do you balance measurable outcomes vs. long-term systemic change?"
},
{
"answer": "Yeah, that's what I would do. I would rank the teams and then make sure that the top teams have the resources to deliver and they could also like pivot. So the actual project is on an indicator of their own quality. Then I would always go for like who's the best team. Yeah,",
"question": "If you had limited resources, how would you decide which project to support?"
},
{
"answer": "and a perspective on we all hold just like a piece of the bigger puzzle foreign",
"question": "Which values guide your evaluations the most (e.g., equity, scale, innovation, sustainability)?"
},
{
"answer": "and a perspective on we all hold just like a piece of the bigger puzzle foreign The first is the 2016-17 season, which was the first season that the team was in the playoffs. An example of a project that I would enthusiastically fund, I mean, there are different ones, like some that are where I see that people are just putting their own work into something very concrete, like a regenerative land project, where you see the actual work and the care they take for the land that they steward, and you can just feel their connection. That is kind of on the one spectrum, something very concrete. And then the other one is the really ambitious, we want to change something where we use innovative technology to make, like to take a stab at a really big problem, which can be,",
"question": "Can you give an example of a project you'd enthusiastically fund, and why?"
},
{
"answer": "some of the attacks strengthen their current inequalities and just, yeah, basically try to do good, but don't really understand the systemic impact of what they do.",
"question": "Can you give an example of a project you'd likely reject, and why?"
},
{
"answer": "some of the attacks strengthen their current inequalities and just, yeah, basically try to do good, but don't really understand the systemic impact of what they do. The first two episodes of the series were released on DVD in 2009.",
"question": "What kind of message would you like to deliver? What signal do you want to give for the next round?"
},
{
"answer": "able to to execute on the ideas that they have and then are they is some motivation correct um so I think the motivation is actually more important than the idea um but it starts with execution because if you cannot execute it doesn't matter how your motivation and your idea doesn't matter if you have execution and the right motivation the ideas will come foreign",
"question": "How do you evaluate idea and execution? How do you separate them?"
},
{
"answer": "tries to interact with that and change it in meaningful ways.",
"question": "What kind of ideas do you value most?"
},
{
"answer": "If they can execute on bigger things, it is also the way they hold themselves and how they are not over promising and know what they can do and cannot do.",
"question": "How do you evaluate if a person or team is talented?"
},
{
"answer": "And the responsibilities that others gave them. Ideally, I would also look for, do I have signals from others about the people? And not only kind of from themselves.",
"question": "If you were an AI, how would you identify talent? What patterns would you look for?"
}
],
"yesNoAnswers": [
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects with strong community governance should receive preference in funding."
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Public goods that effectively demonstrate the benefit of public goods should receive more funding."
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Environmental sustainability should be a key factor in funding decisions."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Innovation and experimental approaches should be prioritized over proven solutions."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects with measurable outcomes should be favored over those with difficult-to-quantify benefits."
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funders should be accountable for the funding they provide to the selected projects."
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Humans are accountable for decisions made by an AI."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Public goods should prioritize immediate community needs over long-term systemic change."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects that already have a lot of support shouldn't receive additional donations for new small projects."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Cost effectiveness should be the primary criterion for funding allocation."
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funding decisions should consider geographic equity and underserved populations."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects that benefit the greatest number of people should be prioritized."
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funding should support projects with sustainable revenue models."
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Open source software should be allocated the most funding compared to other categories."
}
]
}did:plc:nfd56jdcukm76ogr43ckjvr7 | at://did:plc:nfd56jdcukm76ogr43ckjvr7/org.simocracy.interview/3mimshobzt52j