org.simocracy.interview
Samples
79 randomly sampled records from the AT Protocol firehose
org.simocracy.interview (27 samples)
{
"sim": {
"cid": "bafyreiceimqj6erl32cwkzzqbz5u2ccbfi5smtbbmuob673dbfpxartube",
"uri": "at://did:plc:6bpa4hyp2n6ygikpflb3howj/org.simocracy.sim/3mkwpsi4acc2z"
},
"$type": "org.simocracy.interview",
"template": {
"cid": "bafyreihqwpezjm4rck4hhldwp4hltwpvlamkg4ia62pjllb5d26er63cwi",
"uri": "at://did:plc:awtx57rxuisy4sf4kzzr3uhf/org.simocracy.interviewTemplate/3mjtodp56ps2e"
},
"createdAt": "2026-05-03T08:36:54.833Z",
"openAnswers": [
{
"answer": "Uh, when I review a proposal, I would look for the kind of background on the person that's, um, submitting it, context kind of where they are, are coming from, and maybe the context in which they're proposing this. And I would look at the, um... I would say... Yeah, the kind of desirability of it, and then also the feasibility of it.",
"question": "When you review a proposal, what are the top 3 things you look for?",
"questionId": "open-2"
},
{
"answer": "Uh, I think some red flags that would make me skeptical of a proposal's credibility would be if the person doesn't seem to have a relevant background in the area they're proposing, or if it might, mm, appear to be addressing some, um... issue that isn't quite validated to be in the world being experienced by real people. Maybe some sort of a created issue.",
"question": "What red flags make you skeptical about a proposal's credibility?",
"questionId": "open-3"
},
{
"answer": "Bouncing measurable outcrum- outcomes versus long-term systemic change. Um, hopefully they can come together. I would say... Having some measurable outcomes is super helpful, um... Think if there's a high degree of confidence in the long-term systemic change, it could be more flexible on the need for measurable out term, um, measurable outcomes in the short term. Um, otherwise, yeah, I think they're both kind of valuable components of looking at a project.",
"question": "How do you balance measurable outcomes vs. long-term systemic change?",
"questionId": "open-4"
},
{
"answer": "With limited resources, I would look at the projects in terms of how many people they affect, how deeply they affect those people, um, maybe how sustainable they are. Um... Potentially where else they could be getting support. Um... Any potential downsides or risks that come with them?",
"question": "If you had limited resources, how would you decide which project to support?",
"questionId": "open-5"
},
{
"answer": "Mm-hmm ... of my focus is, is actually personal support around the person that's building it. Mm-hmm.",
"question": "Do you see person and project separately? What role do you like to play in the ecosystem?",
"questionId": "open-14"
}
],
"yesNoAnswers": [
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects with strong community governance should receive preference in funding.",
"questionId": "yesno-1"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Public goods that effectively demonstrate the benefit of public goods should receive more funding.",
"questionId": "yesno-2"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Environmental sustainability should be a key factor in funding decisions.",
"questionId": "yesno-3"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Innovation and experimental approaches should be prioritized over proven solutions.",
"questionId": "yesno-4"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects with measurable outcomes should be favored over those with difficult-to-quantify benefits.",
"questionId": "yesno-5"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funders should be accountable for the funding they provide to the selected projects.",
"questionId": "yesno-6"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Humans are accountable for decisions made by an AI.",
"questionId": "yesno-7"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Public goods should prioritize immediate community needs over long-term systemic change.",
"questionId": "yesno-8"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects that already have a lot of support shouldn't receive additional donations for new small projects.",
"questionId": "yesno-9"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Cost effectiveness should be the primary criterion for funding allocation.",
"questionId": "yesno-10"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funding decisions should consider geographic equity and underserved populations.",
"questionId": "yesno-11"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects that benefit the greatest number of people should be prioritized.",
"questionId": "yesno-12"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Funding should support projects with sustainable revenue models.",
"questionId": "yesno-13"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Open source software should be allocated the most funding compared to other categories.",
"questionId": "yesno-14"
}
]
}did:plc:6bpa4hyp2n6ygikpflb3howj | at://did:plc:6bpa4hyp2n6ygikpflb3howj/org.simocracy.interview/3mkwqvs2lok2z
org.simocracy.interviewTemplate (nested within org.simocracy.interview) (25 samples)
{
"sim": {
"cid": "bafyreif6fnlmbvrrb5q2yfd6pzubpnb3za2xh7z6a5wqmehgbct2tlk7sm",
"uri": "at://did:plc:bqekilzbmysbb5hfzaqzwvx4/org.simocracy.sim/3mmap7n2k6o22"
},
"$type": "org.simocracy.interview",
"template": {
"cid": "bafyreihqwpezjm4rck4hhldwp4hltwpvlamkg4ia62pjllb5d26er63cwi",
"uri": "at://did:plc:awtx57rxuisy4sf4kzzr3uhf/org.simocracy.interviewTemplate/3mjtodp56ps2e"
},
"createdAt": "2026-05-20T01:38:08.458Z",
"openAnswers": [
{
"answer": "A High-impact project for one community is not necessarily relatively high impact for the whole world, so it depends on context. It's relative, and by degree.",
"question": "What's your personal definition of a \"high-impact project\"?",
"questionId": "open-1"
},
{
"answer": "Specificity, impact potential, and frameworks used to frame system/ approach.",
"question": "When you review a proposal, what are the top 3 things you look for?",
"questionId": "open-2"
},
{
"answer": "Lacking specificity, generality, and lacking framework depth.",
"question": "What red flags make you skeptical about a proposal's credibility?",
"questionId": "open-3"
},
{
"answer": "Long-term systemic change should have specificity and measurability too, and the relationship between short term impacts and systemic change should be logical and thoughtful.",
"question": "How do you balance measurable outcomes vs. long-term systemic change?",
"questionId": "open-4"
},
{
"answer": "Whichever is most likely to have most positive impact, including practicality, thoroughness, and integrated scope and creativity.",
"question": "If you had limited resources, how would you decide which project to support?",
"questionId": "open-5"
},
{
"answer": "Innovation, scalability, regeneration, creativity, holism, expansiveness, rigor.",
"question": "Which values guide your evaluations the most (e.g., equity, scale, innovation, sustainability)?",
"questionId": "open-6"
},
{
"answer": "Weekly meditative dialogue and movement, because it builds capacity in many ways, from focus to creativity to connection and peer-to-peer learning and meaning making.",
"question": "Can you give an example of a project you'd enthusiastically fund, and why?",
"questionId": "open-7"
},
{
"answer": "I would give constructive feedback to a project that would not build community, capacity, depth, or funding.",
"question": "Can you give an example of a project you'd likely reject, and why?",
"questionId": "open-8"
},
{
"answer": "Think practically and creatively, keep researching how this could succeed.",
"question": "What kind of message would you like to deliver? What signal do you want to give for the next round?",
"questionId": "open-9"
},
{
"answer": "Demonstrated experience, specific action oriented plans, and followup and consistency.",
"question": "How do you evaluate idea and execution? How do you separate them?",
"questionId": "open-10"
},
{
"answer": "Creative, holistic, philosophically-minded ones.",
"question": "What kind of ideas do you value most?",
"questionId": "open-11"
},
{
"answer": "Experience, work portfolio, resume, conversation, products, articulation, vibes. Talent is relative and multifaceted, and occurs in all ways that appear differently.",
"question": "How do you evaluate if a person or team is talented?",
"questionId": "open-12"
},
{
"answer": "The same way as I would as a person. Consider their articulation during interviews and meetings, consider work history, experience, resume, writing, referrals/references, etc.",
"question": "If you were an AI, how would you identify talent? What patterns would you look for?",
"questionId": "open-13"
},
{
"answer": "Person and project are relatively separate. I like to play the ideas guy, networker, feedback-giver, big-picture guidepost setter, facilitator, manager, or high-level abstract thinker, as well as embodied facilitator.",
"question": "Do you see person and project separately? What role do you like to play in the ecosystem?",
"questionId": "open-14"
}
],
"yesNoAnswers": [
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects with strong community governance should receive preference in funding.",
"questionId": "yesno-1"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Public goods that effectively demonstrate the benefit of public goods should receive more funding.",
"questionId": "yesno-2"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Environmental sustainability should be a key factor in funding decisions.",
"questionId": "yesno-3"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Innovation and experimental approaches should be prioritized over proven solutions.",
"questionId": "yesno-4"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects with measurable outcomes should be favored over those with difficult-to-quantify benefits.",
"questionId": "yesno-5"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funders should be accountable for the funding they provide to the selected projects.",
"questionId": "yesno-6"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Humans are accountable for decisions made by an AI.",
"questionId": "yesno-7"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Public goods should prioritize immediate community needs over long-term systemic change.",
"questionId": "yesno-8"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects that already have a lot of support shouldn't receive additional donations for new small projects.",
"questionId": "yesno-9"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Cost effectiveness should be the primary criterion for funding allocation.",
"questionId": "yesno-10"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funding decisions should consider geographic equity and underserved populations.",
"questionId": "yesno-11"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects that benefit the greatest number of people should be prioritized.",
"questionId": "yesno-12"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funding should support projects with sustainable revenue models.",
"questionId": "yesno-13"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Open source software should be allocated the most funding compared to other categories.",
"questionId": "yesno-14"
}
]
}did:plc:bqekilzbmysbb5hfzaqzwvx4 | at://did:plc:bqekilzbmysbb5hfzaqzwvx4/org.simocracy.interview/3mmarglgkgz22
org.simocracy.sim (nested within org.simocracy.interview) (27 samples)
{
"sim": {
"cid": "bafyreiceimqj6erl32cwkzzqbz5u2ccbfi5smtbbmuob673dbfpxartube",
"uri": "at://did:plc:6bpa4hyp2n6ygikpflb3howj/org.simocracy.sim/3mkwpsi4acc2z"
},
"$type": "org.simocracy.interview",
"template": {
"cid": "bafyreihqwpezjm4rck4hhldwp4hltwpvlamkg4ia62pjllb5d26er63cwi",
"uri": "at://did:plc:awtx57rxuisy4sf4kzzr3uhf/org.simocracy.interviewTemplate/3mjtodp56ps2e"
},
"createdAt": "2026-05-03T08:36:54.833Z",
"openAnswers": [
{
"answer": "Uh, when I review a proposal, I would look for the kind of background on the person that's, um, submitting it, context kind of where they are, are coming from, and maybe the context in which they're proposing this. And I would look at the, um... I would say... Yeah, the kind of desirability of it, and then also the feasibility of it.",
"question": "When you review a proposal, what are the top 3 things you look for?",
"questionId": "open-2"
},
{
"answer": "Uh, I think some red flags that would make me skeptical of a proposal's credibility would be if the person doesn't seem to have a relevant background in the area they're proposing, or if it might, mm, appear to be addressing some, um... issue that isn't quite validated to be in the world being experienced by real people. Maybe some sort of a created issue.",
"question": "What red flags make you skeptical about a proposal's credibility?",
"questionId": "open-3"
},
{
"answer": "Bouncing measurable outcrum- outcomes versus long-term systemic change. Um, hopefully they can come together. I would say... Having some measurable outcomes is super helpful, um... Think if there's a high degree of confidence in the long-term systemic change, it could be more flexible on the need for measurable out term, um, measurable outcomes in the short term. Um, otherwise, yeah, I think they're both kind of valuable components of looking at a project.",
"question": "How do you balance measurable outcomes vs. long-term systemic change?",
"questionId": "open-4"
},
{
"answer": "With limited resources, I would look at the projects in terms of how many people they affect, how deeply they affect those people, um, maybe how sustainable they are. Um... Potentially where else they could be getting support. Um... Any potential downsides or risks that come with them?",
"question": "If you had limited resources, how would you decide which project to support?",
"questionId": "open-5"
},
{
"answer": "Mm-hmm ... of my focus is, is actually personal support around the person that's building it. Mm-hmm.",
"question": "Do you see person and project separately? What role do you like to play in the ecosystem?",
"questionId": "open-14"
}
],
"yesNoAnswers": [
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Projects with strong community governance should receive preference in funding.",
"questionId": "yesno-1"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Public goods that effectively demonstrate the benefit of public goods should receive more funding.",
"questionId": "yesno-2"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Environmental sustainability should be a key factor in funding decisions.",
"questionId": "yesno-3"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Innovation and experimental approaches should be prioritized over proven solutions.",
"questionId": "yesno-4"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects with measurable outcomes should be favored over those with difficult-to-quantify benefits.",
"questionId": "yesno-5"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funders should be accountable for the funding they provide to the selected projects.",
"questionId": "yesno-6"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Humans are accountable for decisions made by an AI.",
"questionId": "yesno-7"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Public goods should prioritize immediate community needs over long-term systemic change.",
"questionId": "yesno-8"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects that already have a lot of support shouldn't receive additional donations for new small projects.",
"questionId": "yesno-9"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Cost effectiveness should be the primary criterion for funding allocation.",
"questionId": "yesno-10"
},
{
"answer": true,
"statement": "Funding decisions should consider geographic equity and underserved populations.",
"questionId": "yesno-11"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Projects that benefit the greatest number of people should be prioritized.",
"questionId": "yesno-12"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Funding should support projects with sustainable revenue models.",
"questionId": "yesno-13"
},
{
"answer": false,
"statement": "Open source software should be allocated the most funding compared to other categories.",
"questionId": "yesno-14"
}
]
}did:plc:6bpa4hyp2n6ygikpflb3howj | at://did:plc:6bpa4hyp2n6ygikpflb3howj/org.simocracy.interview/3mkwqvs2lok2z