Lexicon Garden

pet.trezy.featureConsent

This keeper is happy for their pets to be Pet of the Week on Bluesky, with an @mention. The record existing is the yes; deleting it is the no. ⚠ PUBLIC ON PURPOSE, unlike pet.trezy.preferences: the weekly pick has to read it and cannot read a permissioned space, and agreeing to be posted about in public says nothing private. Not signed: forging your own consent is consenting, and a copy in anybody else's repo is never read.

Repository @trezy.pet did:plc:ollch4g7tes2reb5eceiwuol namespace authority
Details · record, key literal:self
Kindrecord
Record keyliteral:self
Authoritytrezy.pet
Indexed
Compare Edit in builder → Fork →

Record

record · key literal:self

Properties

createdAt

requiredstring · datetime

Similar lexicons

semantic match

Lexicons whose schemas describe something close to this one. Check them before publishing a new one that overlaps.

  • pet.trezy.setFeatureConsent

    procedure

    Say yes or no to the caller's pets being Pet of the Week. Yes writes pet.trezy.featureConsent/self into the caller's repo; no deletes it. Idempotent both ways.

  • pet.trezy.feature

    record

    One week's Pet of the Week, held in the publisher's repo. The record key is the ISO week (e.g. 2026-W39), so there is exactly one per week and every step that writes it is idempotent. ⚠ ONLY THE PUBLISHER'S COPY COUNTS. The index refuses this collection from any other repo, because eligibility, the ribbon and the badge all read it.

  • pet.trezy.featureReply

    record

    The featured keeper's answer for one week, keyed by that ISO week. Either a note to quote in the post (text, possibly empty) or decline: true for 'not this time'. Written only by pet.trezy.replyToFeature.