net.neodb.review
A long-form review of a catalog work, authored on a NeoDB instance.
Details · record, key any
| Kind | record |
|---|---|
| Record key | any |
| Authority | neodb.net |
| Indexed |
Record
record · key anyProperties
Review body in Markdown.
fediverseUri
string · uriFediverse (ActivityPub) object URI of the corresponding post on the originating NeoDB instance.
rating
refOptional rating accompanying the review.
maxLength: 2000maxGraphemes: 500
updatedAt
string · datetimeSimilar lexicons
semantic matchLexicons whose schemas describe something close to this one. Check them before publishing a new one that overlaps.
-
A portable user-owned review of an Atmosphere project profile. The reviewer writes this record to their own PDS; AppViews may index and moderate their own display of it.
-
net.neodb.mark
recordA shelf entry recording a user's status toward a catalog work, with optional rating, comment and tags.
-
org.anthers.review
recordA review of a work — whether the reviewer recommends it, and the words that explain why. It is a review rather than a rating because a verdict without reasons tells another user nothing about whether to trust it. A review attaches to a work and to nothing else: a post is an announcement, and recommending one means nothing. It lives in the reviewer's own repository. Editing a review rewrites this record in place rather than writing a new one, so a link to it keeps working — which also means a ref
-
Record containing a review of something.
-
A review of one edition by an actor. Duplicate convention: the rkey is a TID minted once at first create and never changes. Several records may exist for one actor and edition (for example from out-of-band writers); consumers SHOULD treat the record with the greatest `updatedAt` (falling back to `createdAt`) as the winner and break ties by the lowest TID, ignoring the others. This is a convention, not an enforced contract: AppViews MUST tolerate a differing winner, and may see a record's catalog